Next up in order of complexity is the
if
statement. This construct takes a
control expression (evaluated for its truth) and a block. It may optionally have an
else
followed by a block as well. In other words, it looks like this:
if (some_expression
) {true_statement_1
;true_statement_2
;true_statement_3
; } else {false_statement_1
;false_statement_2
;false_statement_3
; }
(If you're a C or Java hacker, you should note that the curly braces are required . This eliminates the need for a " confusing dangling else" rule.)
During execution, Perl evaluates the control expression. If the expression is true, the first block (the
true_statement
statements above) is executed. If the expression is false, the second block (the
false_statement
statements above) is executed instead.
But what constitutes
true and false? In Perl, the rules are slightly weird, but they give you the expected results. The control expression is evaluated for a
string
value in scalar context (if it's already a string, no change is made; but if it's a number, it is converted to a string[
1
] ). If this string is either the empty string (with a length of zero)
or
a string consisting of the single character
0
(the digit zero), then the value of the expression is false. Anything else is true automatically. Why such funny rules? Because they facilitate branching on an emptyish versus nonempty string, as well as on a zero versus nonzero number, without having to create two versions of interpreting true and false values. Here are some examples of true and false interpretations:
[1] Internally, this isn't quite true. But it acts as if this is what it does.
0 # converts to "0", so false 1-1 # computes to 0, then converts to "0", so false 1 # converts to "1", so true "" # empty string, so false "1" # not "" or "0", so true "00" # not "" or "0", so true (this one is weird, watch out) "0.000" # also true for the same reason and warning undef # evaluates to "", so false
Practically speaking, interpretation of values as true or false is fairly intuitive. Don't let us scare you.
Here's an example of a complete
if
statement:
print "how old are you? "; $a = <STDIN>; chomp($a); if ($a < 18) { print "So, you're not old enough to vote, eh?\n"; } else { print "Old enough! Cool! So go vote!\n"; $voter++; # count the voters for later }
You can omit the
else
block, leaving just a
then
part, as in:
print "how old are you? "; $a = <STDIN>; chomp($a); if ($a < 18) { print "So, you ' re not old enough to vote, eh?\n"; }
Sometimes, you want to leave off the
then
part and have just an
else
part, because saying "do that if this is false," is more natural than saying "do that if not this is true." Perl handles this case with the
unless
variation:
print "how old are you? "; $a = <STDIN>; chomp($a); unless ($a < 18) { print "Old enough! Cool! So go vote!\n"; $voter++; }
Replacing
if
with
unless
is in effect saying, "If the control expression is false, do..." (An
unless
can also have an
else
, just like an
if
.)
If you have more than two possible choices, add an
elsif
branch to the
if
statement, like so:
if (some_expression_one
) {one_true_statement_1
;one_true_statement_2
;one_true_statement_3
; } elsif (some_expression_two
) {two_true_statement_1
;two_true_statement_2
;two_true_statement_3
; } elsif (some_expression_three
) {three_true_statement_1
;three_true_statement_2
;three_true_statement_3
; } else {all_false_statement_1
;all_false_statement_2
;all_false_statement_3
; }
Each expression (here,
some_expression_one
,
some_expression_two
, and
some_expression_three
) is computed in turn. If an expression is true, the corresponding branch is executed, and all remaining control expressions and corresponding statement blocks are skipped. If all expressions are false, the
else
branch is executed (if there is one). You don't have to have an
else
block, but having one is always a good idea. You may have as many
elsif
branches as you wish.